Skip to content
Crash Override Endpoint

Prompt to production provenance.

Crash Override Endpoint is the developer-machine surface of the data plane. It observes AI-assisted development where it happens — on the engineer's own machine — so a single deterministic thread runs from a Claude Code planning session all the way through to the push to prod.

Zero-touch through your existing MDM · GA on macOS and Windows · observation mode today

Session timeline

Prompt to commit, in one thread

1 session · 29m · observation mode

  1. E004 Prompt fix the payment retry logic
  2. E009 Plan 3 steps proposed · accepted
  3. E012 Read payments/retry.ts · 412 lines
  4. E018 Edit payments/retry.ts · +12 −4
  5. E024 Shell test suite · exit 0 · 124 passed
  6. E031 Commit signed · queued for build
What it is

We watch the agents. We are not one of them.

Endpoint runs on the developer's machine and observes AI-assisted engineering: which AI coding tools are used — Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Devin — what they were asked to do, what they produced, and how that work moves into the build and out to production. Everything it observes lands in the same provenance graph as Chalk's build and runtime data. Chalk is the data plane; Endpoint extends it to the machine.

Action-level audit

What the agent actually did

  • A017 server.start issue-tracker
  • A019 tool.call search_issues
  • A023 tool.call read_file
  • A026 tool.call write_file denied
  • A031 reference spec/retry-policy
Why it matters

Three questions the AI era created.

You committed real budget to AI coding tools and real political capital to the "use AI" mandate. These are the questions you are now accountable for — and they only become answerable once observability reaches the developer machine.

Return on token spend

Am I realizing a return on our AI spend?

Endpoint ties token and tool spend to delivered outcomes — merges, deploys, tasks actually closed — not to activity. Token-to-ROI, measured rather than asserted.

AI leverage

How well are my engineers actually using AI?

Endpoint measures AI's effect on delivery flow — AI-era DORA metrics — so managers can see where AI is accelerating work and where it is spinning.

Intent traceability

Does the intent set at planning survive to production?

Endpoint follows one deterministic thread from the planning session through generated code, build, deploy and runtime — so a plan can be checked against what actually shipped.

Return on token spend

Token spend, one team, one sprint

  • 62% shipped
  • 23% in review
  • 15% abandoned
  • 38 merges
  • 12 deploys
  • 51 tasks closed
What it observes

Action-level detail, not a summary.

Observed on the machine, deterministically. No model sits in the data path guessing about your code.

Sessions
For transcript-backed tools such as Claude Code and Codex: the prompts and responses themselves, tied to the user, the files, the tools and the network activity around them.
Actions
Tool calls, denied tool use, shell execution with exit codes, and file create, modify and delete.
MCP
First-class visibility into Model Context Protocol activity: server starts, tool calls and references.
Network
External calls the agent initiates — DNS, URLs, methods, status codes and provider routes.
Attribution
Agent-to-source and engineer-to-source attribution, with provider, model and session identity.
Timeline
A session-level unified timeline joining AI activity to source change, build, deploy and runtime.
Deployment

Every developer covered, without anyone opting in.

Endpoint ships zero-touch through the MDM you already run. There is no developer opt-in, no IDE plugin, no Dockerfile change and no CI configuration — so coverage does not depend on every team remembering to instrument every repo.

Zero-touch rollout

Deployed through your existing MDM. No developer opt-in required.

Generally available

macOS and Windows today. Linux is coming soon.

Observation mode

Endpoint observes today. Policy enforcement arrives as an opt-in in Q3 2026.

How we differ

They watch the prompt. We follow it to prod.

The market is filling with AI security and DLP tooling that sits at the prompt or the network egress and tries to control: block prompts, redact, gate. There are two problems with that. Control-first is the antipattern engineers route around — you cannot govern what you cannot see, and gatekeeping kills adoption. More fundamentally, those tools can tell you a prompt happened, but not whether that prompt turned into shipped value, or whether the engineer's intent survived to production. They measure risk at the doorway. We measure delivery through the whole house.

For security teams

Visibility and guardrails, not a checkpoint.

Endpoint answers security's requirements from the same observed data — without becoming the gate engineers route around.

Shadow AI discovery

Find unsanctioned AI coding tools in use across the fleet.

Attribution

Agent-to-source and engineer-to-source, surviving rebases and squashes.

Action-level audit

What the tool did: files, shell, network and MCP calls.

Audit evidence

Assembled as a byproduct of observation, not reconstructed later.

Common Questions

What engineering leaders ask first.


See the thread from prompt to production.

Book 30 minutes with an engineer. We will show you a real session traced from an AI planning prompt through the build and into a running container.