Compliance Audits Demand Evidence. Your Build Has It.
Every audit (SOC 2, FedRAMP, DORA, EU CRA) demands proof of what's in your software, who built it, and how. Teams still spend weeks assembling spreadsheets. We give auditors real-time evidence instead.
Of organizations lack full SBOM coverage across their software portfolio, leaving compliance gaps in every audit.
Average time engineering teams spend preparing evidence for a single compliance audit cycle.
Increase in software supply chain regulations since 2020, with EU CRA, DORA, and updated NIST frameworks all adding requirements.
Evidence that assembles itself.
Continuous Supply Chain Monitoring
Monitor your entire software supply chain: repositories, build systems, registries, and production environments. Crash Override watches for policy violations, dependency changes, and configuration drift continuously, not just at audit time.
- Continuous monitoring across repos, builds, and deploys
- Policy violation alerts in real time
- Dependency change detection across all services
- Configuration drift tracked automatically
Automated Build Inspection
Every build is inspected to extract a complete software bill of materials from actual build output, not manifest files. Dependencies, licenses, build parameters, and source provenance are captured automatically. No developer intervention required.
- SBOMs generated from actual build output, not manifests
- License detection across all dependency layers
- Build parameters and environment captured
- Vulnerability correlation at build time
Cryptographic Attestation
Every artifact is tagged with SLSA-compatible provenance attestations: cryptographically signed, tamper-evident, and machine-verifiable. Auditors get evidence that's cryptographically provable, not screenshots and spreadsheets.
- SLSA provenance attestations on every artifact
- Cryptographic signatures: tamper-evident by design
- Machine-verifiable evidence for automated audits
- Attestation history preserved for audit trails
Real-Time Compliance Posture
Track compliance posture across your entire portfolio in real time. Know which services meet which frameworks, where gaps exist, and what evidence is missing before the auditor asks. Compliance dashboards update as you ship, not when you scramble.
- Framework-mapped compliance dashboards
- Gap analysis across SOC 2, FedRAMP, DORA, EU CRA
- Evidence freshness tracking: no stale attestations
- Exportable audit packages on demand
Software Compliance Knowledge Base
EU CRA, NIST SSDF, FedRAMP 20x, SOC 2 — how the regulatory response to AI-coded software changes the evidence you need.
September 2026 SBOM deadline, €15M / 2.5% turnover ceiling, 10-year retention. What CRA actually demands of teams shipping software in the EU.
SP 800-218 implementation checklist updated for autonomous coding agents. NIST Agentic Profile preview. Federal procurement implications.
Stop spending 12 weeks a year on compliance theater. Continuous evidence collection at build time, evidence-as-code, audit-ready dashboards.
Stop assembling evidence. Start shipping it.
Generate SBOMs, SLSA provenance, and compliance evidence automatically from every build. No spreadsheets. No stale attestations.
Frequently asked about software compliance.
Crash Override generates evidence relevant to SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP, DORA (EU), EU Cyber Resilience Act, NIST SSDF, and SLSA. The platform maps its controls to specific framework requirements so you can see coverage and gaps at a glance.
View full page →Most SBOM tools parse manifest files (package.json, go.mod). Crash Override inspects actual build output, catching vendored dependencies, build-time code generation, and transitive dependencies that manifest-based tools miss.
View full page →No. Crash Override integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline as a build step. It inspects artifacts after they're built, tags them with provenance, and reports results. No changes to your build process required.
View full page →Evidence updates with every build. There's no quarterly refresh cycle or manual collection phase. When an auditor asks for evidence, you export the current state, which reflects your last deployment, not your last audit prep session.
View full page →Real data from real builds. No fabricated policies. No rubber-stamp audits. Every compliance artifact comes from deterministic build inspection, not self-reported questionnaires.
View full page →